Refine your search
Collections
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Harinarayana, N. S.
- Influence of Theories on Factors Affecting Knowledge Sharing
Abstract Views :305 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysore, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Library Development, Vol 1, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 33-39Abstract
Knowledge is an essential resource far an individual or organization. While knowledge sharing is an important human daily activity to create opportunities in maximizing employees' innovation in organization to achieve performance or to grow individually, Knowledge sharing is the process of transferring knowledge from a person to another in organization. However, previous studies have indicated that employees are refused to share knowledge. Many factors influencing knowledge sharing were identified to solve the problem. Critical reviews on factors affecting knowledge sharing; individual, organization and technology factors are frequent mentioned in literature. Thus, this study proposes a conceptual model that takes into consideration the three factors and related theories to support the constructs in developing a fit knowledge sharing model. This study will improve the understanding on theories, factors affecting knowledge sharing. For the paradigm model of theory, the concepts were drawn from the causal condition, contextual condition, main context, intervening condition, interaction strategy and result. In this study, the process of development through the sharing of experience' is identified as being the key category. The study suggests how to improve the quality of the knowledge concerned, organize such knowledge and/or advance its utilization and sharing.Keywords
Knowledge Sharing, Influence Factors and Theories.Full Text
References
- Andrew; Arvind and Segars. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities rerspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
- Bartol, K. M, and Srivastava, A. (2002). Encouraging knowledge sharing: The role of organizational reward systems. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 64-76.
- Bock, G. W., et al. (2005) Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
- Bock, G W., ans Kim, Y. G (2002), Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowhdge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 14-21.
- Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity; A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly. 35(1), 128-152.
- Drucker, P. (1993). Post Capital Society, Butterworth-Heinemen, Oxford.
- Eccles, M. P., et al (2006). Do self-reported intentions predict clinicians' behaviour; a systematic review. Implement Sci, 28(1).
- Gagne, M. (July/August, 2009). A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 571-589,
- Glanz. K.; Lewis, F.M, and Rimer, B.K. (1997). Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 2nd edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco,CA, 19-35.
- Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer; an integrative framework and some practice implication. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(1), 23-30.
- Kankanhalli, A.; Tan. B, C, Y. and Wei. K, K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories; an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29, (1), 113-143.
- Kim, S. and Lee, H. (2006). The impact of organizational context and information technology on employee knowledge-sharing capabilities. Social Science Journal, 66 (3), 370-385.
- Liang, T. P.; Liu, C.C, and Wu, C. H. (2008). Can social exchange theory explain individual knowledge sharing behavior? A meta-analysis. [Available at; http://www.whiceb.com/download/whiceb2008/seminar/Ting-Peng%20Liang.pdf.].
- Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International journal Of Manpower, 28 (3/4), 315-332.
- McDermott, R. and O'Dell, C. (2000). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76-85.
- Nonaka, I. (2004). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. In. Starkey, K, Tempest, S. & McKinlay, A How Organization Learn. Manging the Search for Knowledge, 165-201. Ed.2. London: Thomson Learning.
- Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in Organizations, Organization Science, 3(3), 398-427.
- Park, H. S. and Im, B. C. (2003). A study on the Knowledge Sharing Behavior of Local Public Servants in Korea. [Available at: http://www.kapa21.or.kr/down/2003.(Accessed on 10-03-2012)].
- Perkins, M. B., et al (2007). Applying theory-driven approaches to understanding and modifying clinicians' behavior: what do we know PsychiatrServ, 58,342-348.
- Riege, A. (2003). Three-dozen knowledge sharing barriers managers must consider. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9 (3), 18-35.
- Senge, P. M., (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Curmcy/Doubleday.
- Skyrme, D, J. (1998). Virtual Ernst; A key ingradients of successful knowledge sharing, [Available at: http://www,skyrme.com/updates/ul9.htm. (Accessed on 19-03-2012)].
- Smith, H. and McKeen, J, (2003). Knowledge management in organizations: the state of current practice in Handbook on Knowledge Management, C. W. Holsapple (Ed.). Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Syed Ikhsan, S.O.S. and Rowland, F. (2004). Benchmarking knowledge management in a public organization in Malaysia, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 11 (3): 238-266.
- Van den Brink, P (2003), Social, Organizational and Technological Conditions That Enable Knowledge Sharing, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Holland.
- Wang, S. and Noe, R. A. (2010, June). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
- Wang, S. and Noe, R, A. (2009). Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Expert Systems With Applications, 20 (2). 115-131.
- Wasko, M. M. a.d Faraj. S. (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contnbntion in electronic networks of practice, MIS Quarterly, 29, (1), 35-57.
- Willcoxson, L. (2003). Creating the HRM context for knowledge management, in Human resource management; challenges and future directions. B Millett & R Wiesner (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Australia,
- Yang, J. T. (2004). Job-related knowledge sharing: comparative case studies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(3), 118-126.
- Yu, A.Y. and Khalifa, M. (2007). A Conceptual Model for Enhancing Intra-Group Knowledge Sharing, "City University of Hong Kong, China. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 7(15). [Available at: http://sprouts.aisnet.org/7-15].
- A Comparative Study of Subject Headings in University Libraries in Karnataka
Abstract Views :334 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore- 570006, IN
2 Department of DLISc, University of Mysore,Mysore- 570006, IN
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore- 570006, IN
2 Department of DLISc, University of Mysore,Mysore- 570006, IN
Source
Journal of Library Development, Vol 4, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 17-26Abstract
Subject cataloguing is considered more intellectually intriguing than the descriptive cataloguing. Quality of subject catalogues have been the area of interest for researchers. The present study attempted to analyse the subject catalogue records from four university libraries in Karnataka. The result showed that the subject access to the holdings of the university libraries need to be improved. Subject cataloguers have to pay immediate attention in improving the subject access.Keywords
Subject Headings, Folksonomies, Vocabularies, Subject Cataloguing, Subject Access, Tags, University Libraries, Karnataka, India.Full Text
References
- Drabenstott K. M., Simcox, S., & Fenton, E. G. (2011). End-user understanding of Subject Headings in library catalogs. Library Resources & Technical Services, 43(3), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.43n3.140
- Lu C., Park, J., Hu, X., & Song, I.-Y. (2010). Metadata effectiveness: A comparison between user-created social tags and authorprovided metadata. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.273
- Lu C., Park, J., & Xiaohua Hu. (2010). User tags versus expert-assigned subject terms: A comparison of LibraryThing tags and Library of Congress Subject Headings. Journal of Information Science, 36(6), 763–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551510386173
- Maurer M. B., & Shakeri, S. (2016). Disciplinary differences: LCSH and keyword assignment for ETDs from different disciplines. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 54(4), 213–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1141133
- McCutcheon S. (2009). Keyword vs controlled vocabulary searching: the one with the most tools wins, 27(2), 4. Rolla, P. J. (2009). User tgs versus subject headings. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(3), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.53n3.174
- Schwing T., McCutcheon, S., & Maurer, M. B. (2012). Uniqueness matters: author-supplied keywords and LCSH in the library catalog. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(8), 903–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.703164
- Spiteri L. F. (2006). The use of folksonomies in public library catalogues. Serials Librarian, 51(2), 75–89.
- Strader C. R. (2009). Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(4), 243–250.
- Wetterstrom H. M. (2007). The complementarity of tags and LCSH: A tagging experiment and investigation into added value in a New Zealand library context: submitted to the School of Information Management, Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Library and Information Studies (PhD Thesis). Victoria University of Wellington.
- Yi K., & Mai Chan, L. (2009). Linking folksonomy to Library of Congress subject headings: an exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, 65(6), 872–900. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410910998906
- Urdu Keyboards for Creating Bibliographic Records:An Assessment
Abstract Views :344 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru 570 006., IN
2 Mysore University Library, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru 570 006, IN
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru 570 006., IN
2 Mysore University Library, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru 570 006, IN
Source
Journal of Library Development, Vol 3, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 53-65Abstract
Input Method Editors (IMEs) – keyboard layouts - are the applications essential for converting keystrokes to character in another language. The study examined four different Urdu IMEs (keyboard layouts) to compare them for the creation of bibliographic records in libraries. It was found that there is no significant difference between the keyboards. The implication of the study is that the cataloguers can choose any one of the IMEs of their choice as there is no distinct advantage of any one IME over others.Keywords
Input Method Editors, IMEs, Keyboards, Indic Keyboards, Urdu Keyboards, Perso- Arabic Scripts, Soft keyboards, Bibliographic Data Entry.Full Text
References
- Bad Keyboards [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jul 7]. Available from: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BadKeyboards
- Fadhilah MR, Santosa PI, Kusumawardani SS. Review Layout Keyboard Yang Optimal Untuk Pengetikan Dalam Bahasa Indonesia. SEMNASTEKNOMEDIA ONLINE. 2016 Feb 22;4(1):1-3–97.
- Norman DA, Fisher D. Why Alphabetic Keyboards Are Not Easy to Use: Keyboard Layout Doesn't Much Matter. Hum Factors J Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 1982 Oct 1;24(5):509–19.
- Mackenzie IS, Zhang SX, Soukoreff RW. Text entry using soft keyboards. Behav Inf Technol. 1999 Jan 1;18(4):235–44.
- Sears A, Zha Y. Data Entry for Mobile Devices Using Soft Keyboards: Understanding the Effects of Keyboard Size and User Tasks. Int J Human–Computer Interact. 2003 Oct 1;16(2):163–84.
- Sinha RMK. A Journey from Indian Scripts Processing to Indian Language Processing. IEEE Ann Hist Comput. 2009;31(1):8–31.
- Urdu keyboard. In: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 8]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Urdu_keyboard&oldid=706118145
- Urdu - Madni Keyboard [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jul 8]. Available from: http://urdu-madni-keyboard.software.informer.com/
- Pak Urdu Installer - Urdu Fonts, Urdu Keyboard and Urdu Language Support Installer [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jul 8]. Available from: http://www.mbilalm.com/pak-urdu-installer.php
- C-DAC: GIST - About GIST - INSCRIPT Keyboard Layout [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jul 7]. Available from: http://cdac.in/index.aspx?id=mlc_gist_inscript
- C-DAC: GIST - Products - Tahreer [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jul 8]. Available from: http://www.cdac.in/index.aspx?id=mlc_gist_tahreer Dvorak keyboard typing vs. qwerty how do they compare? do these tests and see [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jul 7]. Available from: http://www.dvorak-keyboards.com/Dvorak_vs_qwertykeyboards.com/Dvorak_vs_qwerty_keyboard
- Measuring up to Standards:A Case Study of Adoption of a School Library
Abstract Views :274 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru, IN
2 SDM Institute for Management Development, Chamundi Hill Road, Siddharthanagar Post, Mysuru, IN
3 Mysore University Library, Manasagangotri, Mysuru, IN
1 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru, IN
2 SDM Institute for Management Development, Chamundi Hill Road, Siddharthanagar Post, Mysuru, IN
3 Mysore University Library, Manasagangotri, Mysuru, IN
Source
Journal of Library Development, Vol 2, No 2 (2016), Pagination: 66-75Abstract
Library has the motherhood status in the society. Everybody wants it. Nobody questions its importance. However, in reality, in many academic institutes – schools and colleges in particularthey exist more like an ornament. It receives the attention when committees visit the institutes for accreditation or some other similar purpose. Teachers, students, and the public rarely complain about the non-availability of library services. A school library, unfortunately, is no exception.Full Text
References
- Proofs Google is God. (n.d). Retrived May3. 2016, from http://www.Patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/02/9-proofs-google-is-god/
- About Us.(n.d).Retrived May 3,2016,from http:/mylismysore.weebly.com/about-us.html
- ALA Archive.(n.d).Retrived May 3, 2016, from http://www.ala.org/Printer Template.cfm?section=archive&templets=/Content Management/ContentDisply.cfm&COntentID-7286
- Arivu Habba 2016/Arivu School Mysore.(n.d). Retrived May 3, 2016, from http://arivu.org/en-2016
- Carr.N.(2008).Is Google Making Us Stupit: Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. 107(2),89-94.http://doi.org/10.111.j.1744-7984.2008.00172.x
- Jabr.F.(2013). The Reading Brain in the Digital Age: The Science of Paper versus Screens. Retrieved May3.2016, from http://www.scientifcamerican.com/article/reading-paper-screens/
- Myberg.C. & Wiberg.N.(2015). Screen vs. paper. What is the difference for reading and learning? Insights. 28(2). http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.236
- Palfrey. J. (2015). BibblioTech: Why Libraries Matter More Than Ever in the Age of Google. Basic Books.
- The Measure of Things-100.47 zettabytes. (n.d). Retrieved May 3. 2016, from http://www.bluebulbprojects.com/MeasureofThings/results.php?comp-data&unit-zb& amt-100.47&sort-pr&p=1
- Relevance of Library Collections for Doctoral Research:A Citation Analysis of Theses in the Field of Education and Physical Education at University of Mysore
Abstract Views :234 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 DOS in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysore, IN
2 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysore, IN
1 DOS in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysore, IN
2 Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysore, IN
Source
Journal of Library Development, Vol 4, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 47-62Abstract
The present study has been undertaken to examine the relevance of Mysore University Library collections for doctoral research in the Faculty of Educatin. The study evaluated 1865 references found in the 20 theses submitted to the University during the period from 1964 to 2013. The study includes the analysis of various variables of the citation such as type, authorship, age and library holdings to meet objectivities of the study. The findings of the study reveals that the overall average number of citations per doctoral thesis in the faculty of Education was 154.24. The researchers cited 43.97% Journals and 41.34% Textbooks in the theses. The result clearly shows that the majority of cited resources (69.44%) were Single author works found in theses. The researchers cited the majority of resources that belong to age group of less than 1 year to 10 years that constituting 733 (39.91%). The Mysore University Library owned 49.78% of 1836 resources cited in the theses. The library ownership of cited resources is varied from one type to another type of resources. The library owned 612(74.63%) of 820 cited Journals and owned 265(34.77%) of 771 cited Textbooks.The age wise availability of cited materials is varying from one decade to another decade. The cited resources that belong to age group of ‘less than 1 year’ and ‘41 to 50 years’ were available more than 65 % each in the library.Keywords
Citation Analysis, Bibliometrics, Library Collection, Collection Management, Doctoral Thesis, References.Full Text
References
- Beile, P. M., Boote, D. N., & Killingsworth, E. K. (2004). A microscope or a mirror?: A question of study validity regarding the use of dissertation citation analysis for evaluating research collections. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(5), 347–353.
- Brazzeal, B., & Fowler, R. (2005). Patterns of information use in graduate research in forestry: a citation analysis of Master’s theses at Mississippi State University. Science & Technology Libraries, 26(2), 91–106.
- Dilevko, J., & Dali, K. (2004). Improving collection development and reference services for interdisciplinary fields through analysis of citation patterns: An example using tourism studies. College & Research Libraries, 65(3), 216–241.
- Fuchs, B. E., Thomsen, C. M., Bias, R. G., & Davis, D. G. (2006). Behavioral citation analysis: Toward collection enhancement for users. College & Research Libraries, 67(4), 304–324.
- Haycock, L. A. (2004). Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development. Library Resources & Technical Services, 48(2), 102.
- Iivonen, M., Nygrén, U., Valtari, A., & Heikkilä, T. (2009). Library collections contribute to doctoral studies: Citation analysis of dissertations in the field of economics and administration. Library Management, 30(3), 185– 203.
- Internet and Mobile Association of India. (2012). Mobile internet in India. Retrieved from http://www.iamai.in/Upload/Research/12201312560802% 5CMobile_ Internet_ Report_Final_64.pdf
- Internet World Stats. (2012). Internet usage statistics. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
- Kayongo, J., & Helm, C. (2009). Citation patterns of the faculty of the anthropology department at the University of Notre Dame. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 28(3), 87–99.
- Salisbury, L., & Smith, J. S. (2010). The use of Web of Knowledge to study publishing and citation use for local researchers at the campus level. Collection Management, 35(2), 69–82.
- Singh K.P. & Chander, H. (2016). Publication output of Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge: A bibliometric analysis. Library Herald, 54(3), 277-288.
- Sin R.N. (2005). A local citation analysis of mathematical and statistical dissertations. Sciece & Technology Libraries, 25(4), 25-37.
- Smith, E. T. (2003). Assessing collection usefulness: an investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate students use. College & Research Libraries, 64(5), 344–355.
- Yeap, C. K., & Kiran, K. (2017). Citation study of library and information science dissertations for collection development. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(2), 29–47.
- Methodological Approach to Assess the Library Catalogues
Abstract Views :305 |
PDF Views:3
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Maritime University (A Central University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru, Karnataka, IN
1 Indian Maritime University (A Central University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Mysuru, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Library Development, Vol 7, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 37-56Abstract
The study focused on assessing the quality of catalogue records of university libraries in Karnataka available through their Web OPACs. The study assessed the various parameters of cataloguing records which determines the quality of the records. This study explains the methodology adopted for this research work in detail. The methodology gives describes the design of the study and procedures, the universities and sample records, instruments, methods of data collection, and treatment of data. The researcher identified nine of the existing 44 universities of Karnataka for the collection of data for the study. Only nine universities provided access to their catalogue records via the internet-based OPACs and hence, they have been selected.Keywords
Web OPAC, Catalogue, Metadata, Cataloguing Quality, Cataloguing Procedures, MARC 21, Metadata Quality, Library Automation, KOHA, University Libraries.Full Text
References
- Avdoyan, L. (1995). Cataloging quality/ : A Library of Congress symposium. In Opinion Papers: Vol. 6. Quality cataloguing (p. 31). Washington D. C.: Library of Congress.
- Chandrappa, & Harinarayana, N. S. (2016). An investigation into the diligence in metadata records of Mysore University Library. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 36(6), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.36.6.10608
- Chandrappa, & Harinarayana, N. S. (2018a). An examination of the quality of catalogue records of management institutes in India. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 55(2), 73–81. https:// doi.org/10.17821/srels/2018/v55i2/119051
- Chandrappa, & Harinarayana, N. S. (2018b). Quality of cataloguing records of university libraries in Karnataka: A study. Gyankosh: The Journal of Library and Information Management, 9(2), 66–74. https:// doi.org/10.5958/2249-3182.2018.00007.2
- Chandrappa, & Harinarayana, N. S. (2018c). What constitutes cataloguing quality? a review of issues and perceptions. ILIS Journal of Librarianship and Informatics, 1(1), 85–93.
- Graham, P. S. (1990). Quality in cataloguing: Making distinctions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 16(4), 213-218.
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001316447003000308
- Library of Congress Cataloging Forum. (1995). Cataloging quality: A Library of Congress symposium: Opinion papers, no. 6. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress Cataloging Forum.
- Zeng, L. (1992). An evaluation of the quality of Chinese-language records in the OCLC OLUC database and a study of a rulebased data validation system for online Chinese cataloging (Doctoral dissertation). University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
- Zeng, L. (1993). Quality control of Chinese-language records using a rulebased data validation system-part 1: An evaluation of the quality of Chinese-language records in the OCLC OLUC database. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 16(4), 25-66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v16n04_03
- Zeng, L. (1994b). Quality control of Chinese-language records using a rule-based data validation system-part 2: A study of a rule-based data validation system for online Chinese cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 18(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1300/ J104v18n01_0